© 2024 Wyoming Public Media
800-729-5897 | 307-766-4240
Wyoming Public Media is a service of the University of Wyoming
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Transmission & Streaming Disruptions

Herrera vs. Wyoming Decision Raises Question Of Definition of Unoccupied Lands

Patricia Lavin

In a close 5-4 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Native American rights.

In the case, the state of Wyoming charged Crow Tribe member Clayvin Herrera with hunting elk during the off season in the Bighorn National Forest. But Herrera claimed an 1868 federal treaty with the tribe gave Crow tribal members the right to hunt on unoccupied lands outside its reservation year-round.

While the Supreme Court sided with Herrera, there's still an outstanding issue: the definition of unoccupied lands. Brian Nesvik, director of the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, said the state's lawyers are in the process of figuring that out.

"Our lawyers in the state are continuing to evaluate what this decision means and how they treated different issues," said Nesvik. "And we realize that we are going to have an opportunity to re-discuss some of those issues, but in court proceedings."

He said meanwhile, the tribe's right to hunt on public lands during off seasons doesn't change the state's hunting seasons or licenses.

"Today the decision doesn't change anything on the ground," said Nesvik. "Nothing changes in the immediate near future."

Kamila has worked for public radio stations in California, New York, France and Poland. Originally from New York City, she loves exploring new places. Kamila received her master in journalism from Columbia University. In her spare time, she enjoys exploring the surrounding areas with her two pups and husband.
Related Content