Sage Grouse Are Back On The Docket

09/14 meeting of Wyoming’s Sage Grouse Implementation Team
Credit Cooper McKim


Energy companies, environmentalists, ranchers and government officials are getting back together at meetings across the West this fall to talk about the fate of a chicken-like bird.


Many of these so-called stakeholders have sat at this table before. The well-being of the Greater Sage Grouse was the focus of a hard-fought compromise among 11 states, finalized a few years ago.


“I think it was extraordinary and a word that is often used is epic collaboration,” Sarah Greenburger, a sage grouse advisor at the Interior Department at the time, said.


Secretary Sally Jewell speaking at Edwin B. Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge to announce Hurricane Sandy resiliency funding.
Credit Keith Shannon/USFWS

“The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service has concluded that the Greater Sage Grouse does not need protection under the Endangered Species Act,” Interior Secretary Sally Jewell announced to a round of applause at a press conference outside of Denver in Sept. 2015.    


An “endangered species” listing would have been a worse-case scenario for a lot of people who use the land where sage grouse live, like ranchers and energy companies, because it could have severely limited their access.


Governors from both parties and stakeholders had worked with federal officials for nearly a decade to come up with plans to protect the Greater Sage Grouse and keep it off the list.


Now, a new Interior Department under Ryan Zinke is asking for changes to those plans, recommending a new policy on energy development in sage grouse habitat and giving states more say in how they protect the bird.


Sarah Greenburger worries that Interior’s recommendations could affect future compromises on big western issues like water rights and wildfires.  


“Here was a situation where it might have been easier to fight, but people chose to work together. If that gets torn down by a small set of interests who didn’t get everything they wanted, I think it’s really disheartening to all of those people who worked so hard to get to that success. And it really calls into question going forward whether people decide to invest that kind of time and commitment into those kinds of solutions,” Greenburger said.


A greater sage-grouse male struts at a lek (dancing or mating ground) near Bridgeport, CA to attract a mate.
Credit Jeannie Stafford/USFWS

President Trump formally prioritized energy development with a directive issued in March, ordering a review of existing regulations that potentially burden energy development.  Since then, his agencies have studied national monuments, environmental regulations and the sage grouse conservation plans.   



In Wyoming, the sage grouse implementation team met for the first time since Secretary Zinke’s recommendations on September 14th. Out of the 30 people there, most seemed uncertain about how changing these plans would actually work. There are 98 different plans, representing states broken up into micro-regions.


“I think some of these things are topics that are moving all over the place — they are moving targets. That’s frustrating as you can imagine for us ... but I think we need to have a pretty robust conversation about a couple of these items,” Bob Budd, chairman of Wyoming’s Sage Grouse Implementation Team, said.


Once numbered in the millions, the Greater Sage Grouse population has dropped range-wide this past century to below 500,000.


In Wyoming, the stakes around conserving this bird are particularly high. Nearly 70 percent of the state is considered sage grouse habitat. Much of that land is also used for ranching, oil and gas development, and wind production. Total economic output from all the activity in those areas adds up to more than a quarter of the state’s economy, according to a study by the University of Wyoming.


Diemer True, Diamond Oil and Gas, at the team meeting
Credit Cooper McKim

“In the past, the Obama administration put up roadblocks against development, and this administration wants to take those roadblocks down without harming the environment,” Diemer True of Diamond Oil and Gas said during the meeting.


Others on the implementation team were not so pleased. Joy Bannon with the Wyoming Wildlife Federations said these stakeholders all had a say the first time around.


“We’ve already gone through all of the details that needed to be in the plans — we worked tirelessly on those specific pieces, and to re-open that door just feels like all the work we did is not being considered as worthy,” Bannon said.

Worthy or not, the grand compromise of 2015 was successful in keeping the Greater Sage Grouse off the endangered species list. The question for all these stakeholders now is if future plans can do the same. The bird will get its next check-up in 2020.